TOEFL EXERCISE

PEMBELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (SOFTSKILL)

PINTAULI
17611869
ERROR ANALYSIS

TYPE A

8.  Mary go  to bed after she  had  drunk the medicines.

              
 Revise: Mary went to bed after she had drunk the medicines.

TYPE B

6. She won’t  be going to the conference, and neither won’t  her colleagues.                  
Revise : She won’t be going to the conference, and neither will her colleagues.


TYPE C
9. He isn’t driving  to the convention in March, and neither they are.
                              

Revise: He isn’t driving to the convention on March, and neither they are.

PEMBELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (SOFTSKILL)

DIRECT SENTENCES

1) Keith Hampton as researcher said they detect what they call the "spiral of silence" phenomenon: Unless people know their audience agrees, they are likely to shy away from discussing anything controversial."People do not tend to be using social media for this type of important political discussion and if anything, it may actually be removing conversation from the public sphere is a communication professor at Rutgers University who helped conduct the study”.

2) Hampton said” the Snowden case provided researchers with a concrete example of a major national issue that divided Americans and dominated news coverage of the 1,801 adults surveyed, 86 percent, they would be willing to discuss their views about government surveillance if it came up at various in-person scenarios, such as at a public meeting, at work or at a restaurant with friends”.

THE CHANGES:

INDIRECT SENTENCES

1) Keith Hampton as researcher said that they detected what they called the "spiral of silence" phenomenon: Unless people knew their audience agrees, they were likely to shy away from discussing anything controversial."People did not tend to be using social media for this type of important political discussion and if anything, it may actually be removing conversation from the public sphere was a communication professor at Rutgers University who helped conduct the study”.

2) Hampton said that Snowden case had provided researchers with a concrete example of a major national issue that had divided Americans and had dominated news coverage of the 1,801 adults surveyed, 86 percent, they would be willing to discussed their views about government surveillance if it came up at various in-person scenarios, such as at a public meeting, at work or at a restaurant with friends.

ARTICLE

Study: Social media users shy away from opinions

People on Facebook and Twitter say they are less likely to share their opinions on hot-button issues, even when they are offline, according to a surprising new survey by the Pew Research Center. The study, done in conjunction with Rutgers University in New Jersey, challenges the view of social media as a vehicle for debate by suggesting that sites like Facebook and Twitter might actually encourage self-censorship. Keith Hampton as researcher said they detect what they call the "spiral of silence" phenomenon: Unless people know their audience agrees, they are likely to shy away from discussing anything controversial."People do not tend to be using social media for this type of important political discussion and if anything, it may actually be removing conversation from the public sphere is a communication professor at Rutgers University who helped conduct the study”. The survey was conducted shortly after former NSA analyst Edward Snowden acknowledged leaking classified intelligence that exposed widespread government surveillance of Americans' phone and email records. Hampton said “the Snowden case provided researchers with a concrete example of a major national issue that divided Americans and dominated news coverage of the 1,801 adults surveyed, 86 percent, they would be willing to discuss their views about government surveillance if it came up at various in-person scenarios, such as at a public meeting, at work or at a restaurant with friends”. But just 42 percent of Facebook or Twitter users said they would be willing to post online about it. What's more, the typical Facebook user, someone who logs onto the site a few times per day was actually half as likely to discuss the Snowden case at a public meeting as a non-Facebook user. Someone who goes on Twitter a few times per day was one-quarter as likely to share opinions in the workplace compared with those who never use Twitter. Only when a person felt that their Facebook network agreed with their opinion were they twice as likely to join a site discussion on the issue, the survey found. Another finding was that social media didn't make it easier for people to share opinions they wouldn't otherwise share. Of the 14 percent of Americans unwilling to discuss the Snowden case with others in person, less than one-half of 1 percent was willing to discuss it on social media. Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Research Center Internet Project, said it's possible that social media actually sensitize people to different opinions."Because they use social media, they may know more about the depth of disagreement over the issue in their wide circle of contacts," he said. "This might make them hesitant to speak up either online or offline for fear of starting an argument, offending or even losing a friend."While many people might say keeping political debate off Facebook is a matter of tact, Hampton said there is a concern that a person's fear of offending someone on social media stifles debate."A society where people aren't able to share their opinions openly and gain from understanding alternative perspectives is a polarized society," he said.

SOURCE: http://m.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/08/27/study-social-media-users-shy-away-opinions.html.

*DIRECT SENTENCES*

1) Keith Hampton as researcher said they detect what they call the "spiral of silence" phenomenon: Unless people know their audience agrees, they are likely to shy away from discussing anything controversial."People do not tend to be using social media for this type of important political discussion and if anything, it may actually be removing conversation from the public sphere is a communication professor at Rutgers University who helped conduct the study”.

2) Hampton said” the Snowden case provided researchers with a concrete example of a major national issue that divided Americans and dominated news coverage of the 1,801 adults surveyed, 86 percent, they would be willing to discuss their views about government surveillance if it came up at various in-person scenarios, such as at a public meeting, at work or at a restaurant with friends”.

 

BUSINESS COMMUNICATION

A POWERFUL COMMUNICATION IN BUSINESS COMMUNICATION

Small talk is an important communication skill in developing your business. I have learned that everywhere we go, We have the opportunity to connect with potential business partners, referrals, and even clients! Small talk builds positive relationships, encourages strong networks, and improves our Charisma Quotient. Whether we are at a holiday party, a wedding, in the line at the grocery store or bank, or attending a professional meeting, the ability to communicate and be comfortable with small talk will be a key to our success.

There are four rules to perfect the Art of Small Talk

1. Do a little homework

We strongly believe in being proactive in life. When we are out and about, look approachable. When we attend a professional event, think ahead of time about who will be there. What their likes and interests are can be helpful in getting a conversation started. When all else fails, people love to be able to talk about themselves! Imagine that we are able to ask a specific question, rather than a generic question, about that person! Our charisma will increase substantially.

2. Greet people appropriately

First and most important, if two people are talking; do not insert ourself into the conversation. It may be private, and we would be seen as an interruption. It is best to join a group of people. Start by making eye contact, smiling, and nodding. When introducing ourself, the level of formality depends on the event. A wedding? Then a hug, or a kiss on the cheek of a friend or family member is appropriate. A networking meeting? No kissing! A firm handshake as our say our first and last name is best.

3. Remember and use people’s names

Most of us can’t remember names because we aren’t listening. Usually when someone is introducing themselves we are thinking about what we will say, or about how they look. People love it when we use their names, and nothing hurts our credibility more than asking someone barely five minutes later, “What did we say our name was again?” A tip: Slow down and pay attention. Then use the name twice after we’ve heard it. This will help we remember!

4. Share enough info to keep them interested

As we begin a conversation, it is important that people feel we want to talk with them. When asked what we do, or where we work, have a sentence or two prepared that will make people want to know more. Don’t just say, “I’m a receptionist.” Say, “I am responsible for incoming communications, whether by phone, mail, or in-person for a 200-employee company.” Don’t just say, “we’re a coach.” Say, “we teach people how to increase their revenue by getting more done in less time.”